Same house, different standard
Set the total conditioned floor area and today's bill. Then switch the same house between weaker and stronger standards.
Approximate conversion based on ECB reference rates.
Same benchmark, two ways to read it
House keeps the number in winter kWh/(m²a). Car turns the same winter gap into a small-car analogy. Bills and the Italian listing label stay in their own rows below.
The fixed benchmark is the Lake house with the same total conditioned floor area and climate.
Optimized passive220 EUR/month
I compare the selected version with the Lake house of the same size and climate.
Running cost is translated through an indicative energy price by system type.
I also estimate delivered energy and relative operating pressure.
House appetite
Optimized passive15.0 kWh/(m²a)
Compared with the Lake house, this version needs far less heating energy to get through the same winter.
For heating alone, this would read as a much smaller monthly slice than the Lake house benchmark.
House mode stays on winter heating demand, so Passive House near 15 and a reasonable new build near 45 still read correctly. Car mode turns that same winter-demand gap into a simple small-car analogy, while the bought heating energy and the Italian listing label stay below as separate layers.
Indicative label in the Italian market: loading.
APE references